<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Writing on Henry Nabholz</title><link>https://nabholz.ai/posts/</link><description>Recent content in Writing on Henry Nabholz</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 21:30:00 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://nabholz.ai/posts/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The 1:5 Ratio: Navigating the Diamond Workforce</title><link>https://nabholz.ai/posts/the-1-5-ratio/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 21:30:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://nabholz.ai/posts/the-1-5-ratio/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In a &lt;a href="https://www.pwc.com/us/en/tech-effect/ai-analytics/ai-agent-survey.html"&gt;recent PwC survey&lt;/a&gt;, 48% of executives said they expect to &lt;em&gt;increase&lt;/em&gt; their headcount because of AI agents. On the surface, that sounds like a failure of technology—wasn’t AI supposed to automate us out of a job?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But I think we’re seeing a &amp;lsquo;Headcount Paradox.&amp;rsquo; The work isn’t going away; it’s being reallocated. We are witnessing the death of the traditional middle manager and the birth of the Builder-Orchestrator.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="the-15-law"&gt;The 1:5 Law&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the legacy corporate world, scaling was a simple math problem: more work required more human hands, which required more middle managers to coordinate them. In the agentic world, we scale with specialized digital labor.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>